Drive Product A growth ↔ Protect Product B revenue
Product A is the company's primary growth lever, but Product B represents the existing revenue base. How aggressively do we tilt incentives toward Product A?
For existing hybrid client rosters, Product B GRR is a guardrail, not a co-equal goal. Product A Standalone and Product A for Sales priorities to be defined separately.
Positions (5/5)
- RVRevOps VP· VP, Revenue Operations Supports
Aligned. Product A must be the primary lever — anything less and the plan signals we don't believe our own strategy.
2 days ago - SSSales Strategy Lead· Sr. Director, Sales Strategy & Ops Supports
Agree on Product A-primary. Suggest we explicitly call out the Product B guardrail size so the field doesn't read it as 'Product B no longer matters'.
2 days ago - SLSolutions Lead· Director, Solutions Strategy Supports
Endorse. SE motion is increasingly Product A-led; comp should follow.
1 day ago - NANorth America Sales Lead· Director, NAMER Existing Business Concern
NAMER existing book is ~70% Product B ARR. A pure Product A-primary signal risks accelerating churn in the segment that funds the pivot. Need a regional guardrail floor.
1 day ago - ELEMEA Sales Lead· Director, EMEA Existing Business Concern
EMEA Product A readiness lags NAMER by ~2 quarters (data residency, language coverage). Product A-primary without a regional ramp will create payout randomness for EMEA reps.
16 hours ago